Comparison
One off check vs ongoing monitoring
A one off check answers where a company stands today. Monitoring answers what changes next. Which you need depends on how long you deal with the company.
Updated 2026-06-20 · 4 min read
Side by side
| One off check | Ongoing monitoring | |
|---|---|---|
| Answers | Where it stands today | What changes from now on |
| Best for | A single transaction | Suppliers, credit customers, partners |
| Effort | Check once | Set once, then alerts come to you |
| Catches later change | No | Yes, while you can still act |
A simple rule
If the relationship ends when the deal does, a one off check is usually enough. If you will depend on the company for months or years, monitor it, because the check you did at the start ages the moment you finish it.
Questions and answers
Do I need to monitor every company I check?
No. Monitor the ones you keep depending on: key suppliers, customers on credit, and long running partners. A one off check is fine for a single transaction.
Check a company before you commit
Run due diligence on any New Zealand company and see the full picture in one place.